Acciones Estructurales y No Estructurales
Updated: Apr 27, 2023
Acciones Estructurales
Las acciones estructurales en un Programa de Protección Civil son aquellas que van encaminadas a disminuir los riesgos en el inmueble que puede producir un evento catastrófico o fenómeno perturbador, como sismo, incendio, inundación, etc.
Pueden ser muy sencillas o que signifiquen una inversión importante en el inmueble para prepararlo apropiadamente ante dichos eventos.
Ejemplo de acciones Estructurales sencillas
Reparación y mantenimiento de la impermeabilización en azoteas
Revisión de las instalaciones de gas, sellado de tuberías
Cambio de piezas por desgaste, tanto en instalaciones hidráulicas como eléctricas
Ejemplo de acciones Estructurales complejas
Realizar obras de infraestructura al inmueble para garantizar su resistencia en caso de emergencia; tales como
Muros de contención para evitar deslaves o inundaciones
Refuerzos a los muros para mejorar su resistencia en caso de sismo
Instalación de equipos de detección de incendios
Acciones No Estructurales
Otras medidas aplicables para la disminución de riesgos en un inmueble, son aquellas se basan principalmente en la organización del personal que utiliza, el inmueble con el objetivo de estar mejor preparado ante los eventos de riesgo.
Algunas de ellas son:
Integración del Comité Interno de Protección Civil del establecimiento
Capacitación de las diferentes Brigadas que integran el Programa de Protección Civil
Realizar recorridos por el inmueble para detectar posibles riesgos y establecer un programa de solución ante los riesgos identificados.
Difundir la cultura de la prevención entre los integrantes de su comunidad o ámbito de trabajo
The idea of making everyday business processes clearer gives me a reason to slow down and consider the details. A simple record of responsibilities can prevent a task from being passed around without an owner. That thought gives me a starting point for exploring practical business organisation in connection with Apcomgroup. I am still thinking through the practical side, because the context can change what seems useful. Which part of a routine process would you make clearer first?
Considering exploring movement through creative practice, I would want to understand a few concrete details before deciding what matters most. Trying the same movement at a different pace can reveal how rhythm changes its character. I would connect Academiededanseclassique with dance and movement practice through an ordinary example rather than a broad claim. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. Which exercises help a beginner connect movement with musical timing?
When it comes to understanding everyday vehicle care, one clear example can stay with me longer than a long list of general points. Describing an observation clearly can be more useful than guessing immediately at its cause. It is the kind of question I would keep in mind when thinking about Vntdc and vehicle maintenance basics. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. What information would you note before asking a practical vehicle-care question?
I find planning travel with room for discovery easier to approach when there is a familiar situation to start from. Leaving space between activities can make a journey more enjoyable than filling every hour. I would connect Uletay with thoughtful travel planning through an ordinary example rather than a broad claim. I can imagine different responses depending on the situation, which makes the question more interesting. How would you balance a few planned stops with time to explore?
A discussion of building confidence through manageable learning goals seems more useful when it connects an idea with something easy to picture. A clear first step can make a difficult subject feel more approachable. That thought gives me a starting point for exploring practical learning skills in connection with Sddtedu. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. How do you decide what to practise when a topic initially seems too broad?